Drop a few paper PDFs, tell me what you need back.
Sign in and you go straight back to the ClaimWeft conversation. Work happens in chat. This page never asks for your card details or email address.
“Logged as contested. Both passages stay attached to the claim; neither is dropped.”
The effect persists after the program ends.
…gains were still present at the six-week follow-up (n = 84).
…no durable effect at the six-week follow-up.
Supplied papers only · no claim is decided by the map
01Folio
See the passage behind every claim—and the conflicts beside it.
Citations alone do not show which passage supports a claim, where studies disagree, or which conclusions still rest on missing evidence. Reconstructing that trail late in a review is slow and error-prone.
The effect persists after the program ends.
…gains were still present at the six-week follow-up (n = 84).p. 18 · §4.1
…no durable effect at the six-week follow-up.p. 22 · §4.3
Logged as contested. Both passages stay attached to the claim; neither is dropped.
Bring a research question, inclusion criteria, and papers you can lawfully use. ClaimWeft organizes source passages into traceable claim links, conflict notes, and evidence gaps you can check.
02Inputs
What this sheet needs from you.
Researchers and evidence-synthesis teams with a defined question, an inclusion scope, and a set of papers that need to become a reviewable evidence record.
- A defined research question and inclusion or exclusion criteria
- Papers or full-text extracts that you have the right to use
- Citation details plus any page or passage locations already recorded
- The claims, outcomes, or comparisons the review needs to examine
03Method
How a map gets made.
- 01
You define the research question, review scope, and the claims that matter.
- 02
You add the papers or excerpts available for this review.
- 03
ClaimWeft records relevant passages and links them to candidate claims without hiding contradictory findings.
- 04
You receive an evidence map that separates source-backed links from open questions and items awaiting verification.
04Delivery
The record is checked before it arrives.
ClaimWeft does not rely on a reminder to stay traceable. Its literature-evidence package rejects a report that breaks these delivery rules.
- Every report cites the material’s own work identifier.
- Every report carries a non-empty set of record IDs.
- Duplicate record IDs and duplicate work entries are rejected.
- The declared evidence-report shape is checked before delivery.
05Limits
What stays with the researcher.
Instead of a loose pile of citations, build evidence records that show the source, excerpt, claim link, and review decision. Conflicting findings sit side by side.
Keep checking
- Researchers still verify passage locations, citation links, and inclusion criteria.
- Coverage, evidence interpretation, and research conclusions need expert confirmation.
Not the right fit
- Comprehensive literature searching when the relevant papers have not been supplied
- Research material that cannot be lawfully shared or inspected at passage level
- Treating extracted passages as sufficient proof without checking page locations and study context
- Replacing expert judgment about evidence quality, bias, or the final research conclusion
06Starter
Start with one bounded evidence map.
The workspace opens as a conversation. Your supplied material stays beside the claims, conflicts, and review decisions it informs.
$19.00 is stated here before you register; card payment runs through Stripe Checkout inside the signed-in workspace.
Continue to workspace billing07Questions
Before you place papers on the desk.
What material should I bring?
Bring a defined research question, your inclusion criteria, and the papers or full-text extracts you are allowed to use. Existing citation details and page markers make the resulting map easier to verify.
What does the evidence map contain?
It contains identifiable source records, relevant excerpts with page locations, links between passages and claims, and separate notes for conflicts, gaps, and uncertain interpretations.
Does ClaimWeft search every academic database?
No. It works from papers and accessible material supplied for the review; it does not establish that the literature search is complete.
Can the map decide whether a claim is true?
No. It makes the supporting and challenging passages easier to inspect, while evidence quality, study context, and the final conclusion remain researcher decisions.
How are disagreements handled?
Conflicting findings remain side by side with their source passages instead of being blended into one answer, so a reviewer can assess the disagreement directly.